There has been a lot of seminar recently about media bias. Liberals point to the fact that the media has come to be consolidated among a relatively few big corporations and therefore, has a bias to the right. Conservatives point to the fact that most population in the media, based on surveys, are registered democrats and vote consistently for the democrat candidate, thereby displaying a bias to the left.
In fact, neither of these claims proves media bias. It is ludicrous to say that because the media is consolidated among a few corporations that it is, therefore, biased to the right. Historically, corporations have donated as much to democrat candidates as to republican ones. There are as many democrats who run big corporations as there are republicans.
Funny Quotes From Movies
For example, according to OpenSecrets.org, these corporations all lead significantly more to democrats than republicans; Comcast, normal Electric, Boeing, Verizon, Capital Group Companies, Exelon Corp. In fact, most corporations hedge their bets and lead just about the same whole to democrats as they do to republicans. For the ones that truly take a stand and make a point of going to one party over the other, most truly lead more to democrats than to republicans! The idea that corporations are interchangeable with republicans is a myth.
History of the World Part I Best
Rate This Product :
History of the World Part I Overview
HISTORY OF THE WORLD PART I - DVD Movie
Customer Reviews
*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Feb 07, 2012 19:35:09
Similarly, to say that because most population in the media vote for democrats does not prove bias either. It is inherent to vote predominantly for democrats (or republicans) and still be an objective reporter (possible but in practice, not likely). The only way to prove media bias is to look at what the media truly does - What does it cover? How much time does it devote to positive stories? How does it frame those stories?
It is clear that the Main Stream Media (Msm), which consists of Abc, Nbc, Cbs, Cnn, The New York Times and the wonderful majority of print and broadcast media, along with most of the entertainment industry in Hollywood as well as news magazines such as Time and Newsweek, devotes time to some stories and neglects others. The decision to neglect positive stories has created a void for those stories. An alternative media has sprung up out of necessity to fill that void. The alternative media consists mostly of Fox Cable News and talk radio. The internet has been successfully used by both the Msm and the alternative media.
Looking at actual stories, it is clear that the Jeremiah Wright controversy was not going to be looked into with any investigative zeal by the Msm. What the Msm failed to realize is that a large whole of population cared about this story. population were enraged at the hatred this reverend demonstrated towards the United States and they questioned why a presidential candidate would sit in a church for over 20 years and listen to rants against the very country that the candidate wanted to be the president of!
Recent quotes pulled out of "Journolist" which is a listserve (think of it as a long email chain) show that journalists were actively seeking to bury the Reverend Wright story. These were not just population writing on a blog. They were journalists with the power to follow the editorial decisions of major newspapers, networks and magazines.
For example, Michael Tomasky, who writes for the Guardian, said to other members of "Journolist": "Listen folks'in my opinion, we all have to do what we can to kill Abc and this idiocy (Abc anchor George Stephanopoulos had the nerve to bring up the Wright issue) in anything venues we have. This isn't about defending Obama. This is about how the (mainstream media) kills any occasion of discourse that truly serves the people."
Who is Michael Tomasky to decide how to "serve the people"? A reporter's job is to ask questions and to get at the truth. When a story is "uncomfortable" to your belief system, is it proper to bury the story and smear those who want to get to the bottom of it? Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent tried to generate a atmosphere of fear so that no one would dare talk about the Wright story. He said on "Journolist", "Pick one of Obama's conservative critics, "Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists." In fact, this very scandal is now a story in and of itself but don't hold your breath waiting for the Msm to cover it. If Fox news, however, threatened to arbitrarily smear population for talking about positive stories, the Msm would be on it and there would probably be a congressional investigation!
For many people, a "smoking gun" email chain wasn't indispensable to prove media bias in the Msm. population have observed this straight through the years such as in 1994 when Peter Jennings described the republican takeover of the house as a "temper tantrum". Dan Rather was willing to put doctored documents on the air in an exertion to put George Bush in a bad light. The funny thing about "Rathergate" was that it wasn't much of a story, even if were true! It just goes to show what lengths reporters will go to in order to put man they don't like (conservatives) in a bad light. When Newt Gingrich received a bonus for a book he was writing while he was an active member of congress, the Msm criticized him endlessly for it but when Senator Clinton got an even bigger bonus the only thing heard was crickets. The examples are endless.
More recently the Msm has ignored horrific details in Obama's healthcare bill and "stimulus" plan. They've misrepresented the situation of the Shirley Sherrod firing and slandered Andrew Breitbart for daring to post a video of the speech. Just for the record, days before Breitbart posted that video; the Naacp said that the Tea Party had racists in their group. This statement was given with no proof whatsoever but the Msm reported it dutifully.
Whatever context the Sherrod video was in, it showed that Naacp members were laughing when Sherrod spoke about "sending a white man to one of his own". That is an outrageous statement and the reaction by members of the audience to the speech was telling. Yet no one in the Msm brought up that angle of the story. Now the Msm is talking about Sherrod as if she is a hero and Breitbart as if he is Satan. But Breitbart did a assistance to the truth showing that those who condemn others of racism should clean their own house first.
The alternative media has risen because of simple contribute and demand. population on the left don't seem to understand contribute and inquire when it comes to basic economics so it's not surprising that they don't quite catch the association when it comes to the media. Bill Press, who wrote a book about bringing back some form of the "Fairness doctrine" to talk radio, said on an interview recently that his book was only involved about talk radio and not about biases on television or newsprint. Yet one cannot talk about the success of conservative talk radio in a vacuum.
Conservative talk radio has succeeded because there is a ravenous hunger for information. population are tired of seeing the Msm misrepresent who they are and what they believe in. They are tired of the condescension shown by the Msm to anything religious or patriotic. They are tired of having their views and beliefs belittled. Not only at news networks but in the movies, conservative characters are presented as evil. It may be one unnecessary line or part of the main theme of the movie but it is there more often than not. It may be at a concert where all you want is to hear the music but have to listen to the singer denigrating the things you hold dear to your heart.
People can say anything they want. Free speech is a good thing but selection of where to get data is also a good thing. population have turned away from the Msm and flocked to other sources because their priorities of what is prominent are not the same as those held by population in the Msm. population in the Msm don't seem to care. Those who don't share their foresight of the world and what is prominent are just mere troglodytes. The Msm will never convert to satisfy the needs of their audience for data because that kind of data is "beneath" them. In the minds of population in the Msm, they have a "higher" calling which only they get to define and only they get to judge.
The Main Stream Media and the Void it Leaves BehindJustin Timberlake Knows His Movies Tube. Duration : 1.35 Mins.It turns out Justin Timberlake isn't only a movie star, he's a movie buff. The entertainer played a game that put his movie quote knowledge to the test. You won't believe the results!
Tags: ellen, justin timberlake, games, Sing, singing, sang, sung, sings, perform, performance, performed, performs, music, song, movie, trivia, films, The, Show, theellenshow, fun, funny, hilarious, hysterical, season, nine, daytime, talkshow, degeneres, comedy, laugh, humor, The Ellen degeneres Show, Humour, Joke, Television Show
No comments:
Post a Comment